References & Citations
 Giess Catherine S., et.al; Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment
Read More: https://www.ajronline.org/doi/full/10.2214/AJR.17.17983
 Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 155(8):481-92, 2011.
 Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 380(9855):1778-86, 2012.
 Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Griffin J, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Harms of breast cancer screening: systematic review to update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 164(4):256-67, 2016.
 Berg WA et.al; Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 28;108(4). pii: djv367. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv367. Print 2016 Apr.
Denise Thigpen *, Amanda Kappler and Rachel Brem; The Role of Ultrasound in Screening Dense
Breasts—A Review of the Literature and Practical Solutions for Implementation; Diagnostics 2018, 8, 20; doi:10.3390/diagnostics8010020
 Arleo EK1, Saleh M2, Ionescu D2, Drotman M2, Min RJ2, Hentel K2. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience. Clin Imaging. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(4):439-444. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
 Shermis et al, Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening with Molecular Breast Imaging for Women with Dense Breast Tissue AJR 2016; 207:1–8
 Melnikow et al, Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , Annals of Internal Medicine